OBAMA LIED – Wikileaks: Obama Had No Intention of Allowing Spain To Investigate Prosecution of the Bush 6

Washington Post: 4/22/09

Obama Open to Prosecuting Bush Officials Over Abuse

“President Obama yesterday declined to rule out legal consequences for Bush administration officials who authorized the harsh interrogation techniques applied to “high-value” terrorism suspects, saying the attorney general should determine whether they broke the law.”

12/01/10 David Corn: MotherJones

Obama and GOPers Worked Together to Kill Bush Torture Probe

A WikiLeaks cable shows that when Spain considered a criminalcase against ex-Bush officials,
the Obama White House and Republicans got really bipartisan.

In its first months in office, the Obama administration sought to protect Bush administration officials facing criminal investigation overseas for their involvement in establishing policies the that governed interrogations of detained terrorist suspects. An April 17, 2009, cable sent from the US embassy in Madrid to the State Department—one of the 251,287 cables obtained by WikiLeaks—details how the Obama administration, working with Republicans, leaned on Spain to derail this potential prosecution.

The previous month, a Spanish human rights group called the Association for the Dignity of Spanish Prisoners had requested that Spain’s National Court indict six former Bush officials for, as the cable describes it, “creating a legal framework that allegedly permitted torture.” The six were former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales; David Addington, former chief of staff and legal adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney; William Haynes, the Pentagon’s former general counsel; Douglas Feith, former undersecretary of defense for policy; Jay Bybee, former head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel; and John Yoo, a former official in the Office of Legal Counsel. The human rights group contended that Spain had a duty to open an investigation under the nation’s “universal jurisdiction” law, which permits its legal system to prosecute overseas human rights crimes involving Spanish citizens and residents. Five Guantanamo detainees, the group maintained, fit that criteria.

Soon after the request was made, the US embassy in Madrid began tracking the matter. On April 1, embassy officials spoke with chief prosecutor Javier Zaragoza, who indicated that he was not pleased to have been handed this case, but he believed that the complaint appeared to be well-documented and he’d have to pursue it. Around that time, the acting deputy chief of the US embassy talked to the chief of staff for Spain’s foreign minister and a senior official in the Spanish Ministry of Justice to convey, as the cable says, “that this was a very serious matter for the USG.” The two Spaniards “expressed their concern at the case but stressed the independence of the Spanish judiciary.”

Two weeks later, Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) and the embassy’s charge d’affaires “raised the issue” with another official at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The next day, Zaragoza informed the US embassy that the complaint might not be legally sound. He noted he would ask Cándido Conde-Pumpido, Spain’s attorney general, to review whether Spain had jurisdiction.

On April 15, Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.), who’d recently been chairman of the Republican Party, and the US embassy’s charge d’affaires met with the acting Spanish foreign minister, Angel Lossada. The Americans, according to this cable, “underscored that the prosecutions would not be understood or accepted in the US and would have an enormous impact on the bilateral relationship” between Spain and the United States. Here was a former head of the GOP and a representative of a new Democratic administration (headed by a president who had decried the Bush-Cheney administration’s use of torture) jointly applying pressure on Spain to kill the investigation of the former Bush officials. Lossada replied that the independence of the Spanish judiciary had to be respected, but he added that the government would send a message to the attorney general that it did not favor prosecuting this case.

The next day, April 16, 2009, Attorney General Conde-Pumpido publicly declared that he would not support the criminal complaint, calling it “fraudulent” and political. If the Bush officials had acted criminally, he said, then a case should be filed in the United States. On April 17, the prosecutors of the National Court filed a report asking that complaint be discontinued. In the April 17 cable, the American embassy in Madrid claimed some credit for Conde-Pumpido’s opposition, noting that “Conde-Pumpido’s public announcement follows outreach to [Government of Spain] officials to raise USG deep concerns on the implications of this case.”

Still, this did not end the matter. It would still be up to investigating Judge Baltasar Garzón—a world-renowned jurist who had initiated previous prosecutions of war crimes and had publicly said that former President George W. Bush ought to be tried for war crimes—to decide whether to pursue the case against the six former Bush officials. That June—coincidentally or not—the Spanish Parliament passed legislation narrowing the use of “universal jurisdiction.” Still, in September 2009, Judge Garzón pushed ahead with the case.

The case eventually came to be overseen by another judge who last spring asked the parties behind the complaint to explain why the investigation should continue. Several human rights groups filed a brief urging this judge to keep the case alive, citing the Obama administration’s failure to prosecute the Bush officials. Since then, there’s been no action. The Obama administration essentially got what it wanted. The case of the Bush Six went away.

Back when it seemed that this case could become a major international issue, during an April 14, 2009, White House briefing, I asked press secretary Robert Gibbs if the Obama administration would cooperate with any request from the Spaniards for information and documents related to the Bush Six. He said, “I don’t want to get involved in hypotheticals.” What he didn’t disclose was that the Obama administration, working with Republicans, was actively pressuring the Spaniards to drop the investigation. Those efforts apparently paid off, and, as this WikiLeaks-released cable shows, Gonzales, Haynes, Feith, Bybee, Addington, and Yoo owed Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton thank-you notes.


Print Friendly

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Facebook comments:


  • FlamingLiberl
  • TaterSalad
  • mike

    This only shows more and more by obama that BOTH the democrat and republican parties are one and the same. This isn’t the first time that a democrat president basically pardoned the crimes of the former repub administration have done. Same thing happened after the crimes of reagan and hw bush, clinton did NOTHING to get them prosecuted. Same thing happened when gerald ford pardoned nixon. American politicians ALWAYS look out for each others backs whenever crimes are being committed, it’s nothing new.

  • norbrit

    2nd that chauncey

  • chaunceythegardner

    Grayson/Fe ingold 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Camper637

    retweet It breaks my heart to know he has done this. And what thanks did he get for doing so from the Republican s? They sure as he// didn’t work toward improving our nation in any way. The Repubs treat Obama like he’s an idiot. I’ve always said that despite his flaws Obama was a good man. I am beginning to doubt this now.

  • littlejuno

    This deeply saddens me and feels like the last straw for my continued, dogged support for President Obama. To work with the Republicans to protect a war criminal, albeit our former president, is despicable .


    Obama always said he wanted to look forward and not backward, when asked about this subject. Extremely disappoint ing, but a shock? No.

  • armando

    More bad news for the American people.

  • jd

    Another day, another reason to regret my support of Obama.

  • norbrit

    Did it ever occur to Obama that he’s in this mess because he didn’t have the stones to let justice be done here?

  • What A Long Strange Trip

    Obama? You suck and I’m sorry I voted for you…or anyone else. You’ve completely crapped on your supporters. So, Merry Christmas and a Happy Screw You.

  • supersizeme

    Obama may be intellectually intelligent, but he is politically stupid. He is rolling over for the Republicretins and shows no sign of correcting his path. I voted for him. I suppose I still support whatever his big picture vision was, but have no confidence in him at all.

  • FlamingLiberl

    Bush and clan should have been arrested

  • DawnnjoeyB

    I am so deeply ashamed of the so-called “leadership” of this country.